How a Government Agency Became a Slush Fund for Climate Alarmism

The USGCRP was established in 1990 to study environmental changes and their impact on society. The program was created by the Global Change Research Act, which was signed into law by President George H.W. Bush. The USGCRP is composed of 15 government departments and agencies, and as of 2025, it has a budget of $4.95 billion.

How the USGCRP Works

The USGCRP is responsible for providing the scientific foundation to support informed decision-making across the United States on climate change. However, the program’s methodology has come under fire in recent years. The USGCRP outsources much of its work to contractors, with the primary contractor being the ICF.

• The ICF is a massive government contractor with a history of being involved in partisan politics.
• It has received over $2 billion in contracts during the Biden administration.
• ICF’s stock value has dropped precipitously since Donald Trump’s election victory in 2016.

The Influence of the ICF

The ICF’s influence on the USGCRP is significant. According to an official who has worked on the National Climate Assessment, the ICF controls the outcome of the report. “By providing all staff for the USGCRP, a federal agency, the ICF exerts undue influence over the global change narrative and priorities presented by the federal government,” the official explained. The ICF supplies all staff associated with the USGCRP, except for the Executive Director and the Director of the National Climate Assessment. This lack of transparency and oversight has raised concerns about the program’s integrity.

The ICF’s Ideological Alignment

The ICF’s ideological alignment is evident in its publicly stated views. The company has been involved in partisan politics and has received funding from liberal organizations.

“ICF is a prime example of a contractor who is shaping the science to fit the politics,” said Houston Keene, a former journalist and leader of a government transparency organization.

The Problems with Outsourcing
Outsourcing the National Climate Assessment to the ICF has raised concerns about the program’s integrity. The company’s ideology and financial conflicts of interest may influence the report’s findings.

1. The ICF is a massive contractor with significant financial interests in the climate industry.
2. The company’s ideology is aligned with the climate alarmist agenda.
3. The lack of transparency and oversight has raised concerns about the program’s integrity.

The Budget and Funding

The USGCRP has a budget of $4.95 billion as of 2025. However, the program’s funding is not transparent, and it is unclear how much of the budget is allocated to the ICF.

The Consequences

The consequences of the USGCRP’s funding model and the ICF’s influence are far-reaching.

A Call to Action

The USGCRP’s funding model and the ICF’s influence raise concerns about the program’s integrity. It is essential to ensure that the program is transparent and free from ideological bias. The USGCRP’s findings have significant implications for policy and decision-making. However, the program’s methodology and funding model raise serious questions about the accuracy and reliability of the report’s findings. By ensuring transparency and oversight, the USGCRP can provide a scientific foundation for informed decision-making on climate change.

References

No references are provided as this article is based on the original text.